Thursday, August 23, 1990
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENC post
Issue 4 :
In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This
has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source
in moon.
ISSUE 5 -
How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if
there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?

ISSUE 6 -
There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in
the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.
Issue-7 :
The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the
spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?issue 8: The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.
This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the
LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around
the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints
should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not
maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.
issue 9: There is no dust on LM footpads.
-- According to Kaysing and Fox, this is the
strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked. They allege that with the swirling
dust from LM descent engine, the foot pads should be covered with dust.
issue 10 :
The pictures below show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the
airless Moon, just as we all knew.

SO IT MEANS THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON.
 
posted by Ammie at 1:19 AM | Permalink |


0 Comments: